Green & Schafle Client Awarded $130,000.00 for his GBS Caused by a Flu Shot

David Carney by David Carney, Partner of Green & Schafle

Learn how David Carney won $130,000 for client that developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after a flu shot

Through the efforts and strong arguments of David Carney and his vaccine litigation team, petitioner Sands was awarded $130,000.00 in damages for his Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) that was caused by an influenza vaccine (flu shot.) Mr. Sands was given the flu shot on November 20, 2018, and about two weeks later, he started experiencing symptoms of GBS. Mr. Sands began feeling weakness throughout his body, numbness in his hands and feet, and a loss of balance. Mr. Sands treated with prescription medication, EMGs, and visits with a neurosurgeon, physical therapist, and his primary care doctor. Even with this treatment, Mr. Sands was not given a diagnosis until approximately four months after his vaccine, when it was confirmed that he was suffering from GBS. Further, Mr. Sands had to take time off work from December 2018 through March 2019 due to his injury, and then only worked a few hours a day when he was finally able to return to work. Even after treating his GBS for nearly a year, Mr. S experienced residual symptoms of GBS, including numbness in his feet and fingertips, and a jittery feeling in his arms and legs. The Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Justice defended the case and made the faulty argument that Mr. Sands had a mild case of GBS and recommended an award of $55,000.00. Mr. Carney emphasized that $55,000.00 was a paltry sum to compensate someone that had been paralyzed from a deadly autoimmune disease and required aggressive treatment and rehabilitation to recover. The Court agreed with Mr. Carney that the severity of GBS that required an impatient hospitalization, diagnostic testing and IVIG treatment, and the positive recovery through rehabilitation warranted an award of $130,000 for Mr. Sands' pain and suffering. Further, the Court indicated that the Respondent (DHHS) did not give sufficient weight to the seriousness of a GBS injury or the specific facts of Mr. Sand’s case. Lastly, the Court held that GBS is a serious injury that justifies a six-figure award even though Mr. Sands did not have the worst case of GBS or a complicated and lengthy recovery.
Request a Callback
×
Green & Schafle Client Feedback ()

Back to top
On This Page ×

What is the VICP? How does the VICP Work? What Vaccines are Covered by the VICP? How to File a Petition? Who Can File a Petition? What are the VICP Petition Steps? Do You Need a Lawyer to File a VICP Petition? What are the VICP Vaccine Injury Severity Requirements? What are the VICP Statute of Limitations? What are Vaccine Injury Settlements and Payouts?
Back to top